Skip to content
Menu

Good Letters

Holy FlowerThe first time I saw her, I made up a story about her, and it was all wrong.

This was in the autumn several years ago, when, in my third-time’s-a-charm attempt at entering the Catholic Church, I stumbled into Adoration each evening at my Capitol Hill parish. Here, in the cool of the day, God’s body gazed like a gentle eye from the altar while our priest heard confessions in the back, and the usual suspects—the older woman on whom I fixed a story, and an older gentleman in a bright blue windbreaker—beheld and snoozed, respectively.

Who was this older woman?

Seated in the shadow of a pillar, wearing a gray coat and a little gray cap, she was nearly invisible. I would have missed her entirely had I not glanced back on my way to my own perch, where I knelt on the floor near the altar. Her countenance glowed in an intangible way, as if she had swallowed a lit candle. Her eyes held an expression of unfurling desire and relief.

Each evening as I walked the side aisle, I stole a glimpse of her face.

The story I made up about her seized on two things: the strength of her gaze—which seemed to suggest a strong body and a sense of duty—and the strangely exalted fatigue it bore. I decided she lived in the neighborhood, close enough to walk to the church in her little cap and coat, and that Adoration was her refuge after a long day of caring for her own elderly mother.

The story kept me company for a few weeks of watching, and in some ways, I think it protected me from imagining a less favorable life for her—a life that, save for the glow of her face, might have tempted me to an unnecessary secondhand despair.

At the time, as I mused on all this, I recalled the counsel of a friend who once exhorted me to stop making up stories about every human being on whom my eyes fell. I see now that this friend was attempting to steer me away from the sin of curiosity: the desire for knowledge that does not belong to us or have any use in our lives, a kind of cousin to lust or gossip.

Because the older woman’s face was so captivating, I could intuit and almost taste, for perhaps the first time in my life, the falseness and inadequacy of the story that my curiosity had created for her. And I wanted to know her, as she truly was.

So one night I followed her out of Adoration and easily caught up to her walking pace, gentle and dainty with the pain of age, and I brightly asked her how she was. Her response was chilly and hawkish: all the gentleness drained from her face, and she gave me a sharp reply.

I tried this a couple more times before I gave up post-Adoration stalking and asked God if He would arrange a friendship for us. And He did, over the course of several years. It was a small-town, platonic courtship of the kind that Capitol Hill affords: crossing paths at the park, the post office, the coffee shop, the bus stop.

Eventually, when I saw her in the evenings at Adoration, she recalled my name and brought me clippings of poems she thought I might like. After a while, she let me walk her home to the sparse hermitage of her apartment and survey the books on her tidy shelf.

I discovered that of the details in that first story, I had gotten only one thing right: she did indeed live around the corner from the church, close enough that, in her younger years, she could have dashed from one portico to the next in about five minutes.

Last week, after years of my hoping, she finally suggested that we have dinner together after Adoration.

She insisted on paying, steered us slowly to the neighborhood Tex-Mex place, and promptly ordered a Miller Lite. There, in the worn-out bustle of a late happy hour, her God-lit gaze fell like a furtive blessing on my face, the scarred table before us, and the young Hill staffers teeming at the doors.

I recalled the moment when, at the close of every Adoration, the priest raises up the monstrance and presents God’s gaze to every corner of the church, with a solemnity that supposes the Host’s power to see, know, and probe every heart, with no appetite and no imaginings save those of Love.

 

Image above is by Jason Lander, licensed by Creative Commons.


The Image archive is supported in part by an award from the National Endowment for the Arts.

Written by: Laura Bramon

Laura Bramon lives in Washington, DC, where she works on international child protection issues. Her creative work appears in The Best Creative Non-Fiction (W.W. Norton), Image, Books & Culture, Featherproof Press, and other outlets.

4 Comments

  1. Peggy Rosenthal on June 8, 2016 at 7:56 am

    Beautiful, Laura. You have a gift for narrative, and for tracing the mysterious drama of relationships.



    • Laura Bramon on June 8, 2016 at 8:34 am

      Thank you, Peggy! You have a gift for insightful encouragement.



  2. Noemy Banuelos on June 16, 2016 at 7:36 pm

    Hello Laura, So i took your advise and sneaked to my dorm, at Franciscan University, to look up this Magazine as well as some of your work, and I have to say, your vocabulary is rich and it seems to be, apart from the beautiful experiences of life you’ve had, the source of captivity in your writings. You were a little blessing from God today! – Noemy Banuelos… English Major at FUS 🙂



  3. nobody.really on July 20, 2017 at 12:52 pm

    Lovely!

    Yet I must confess, I really wanted to reply to “Love at the Edge,” discussing the inadequacy of mere wealth redistribution as a means to reach the outcast. I was reminded of THE VISION OF SIR LAUNFAL by James Russell Lowell (the guy who wrote the hymn “Once to Every Man and Nation”).

    Synopsis: Religious passion leads a young nobleman, Sir Launfal, to pledge himself to a quest for the Holy Grail. The night before he is to depart, he has a vision. Sir Launfal imagines himself strong and proud on horseback, setting out from his castle gate. Everything is perfect – except for an unsightly leper that appears, seeking alms, which kind of spoils things. He tosses a coin to the guy and sets off on his quest.

    Launfal returns decades later, an old, broken man. No grail, no money, and someone else now occupies his throne. At the edge of the moat he stares through the windows at the strangers celebrating Christmas in his old hall. He turns away, only to come face to face with the leper again. Now Launfal has no coin to offer. Instead, he breaks his crust of bread in half, breaks through the ice to scoop out some water, and offers them to the stranger. And in that act, Launfal finally finds what he had been looking for:

    ‘Twas a mouldy crust of coarse brown bread,
    ‘Twas water out of a wooden bowl,–
    Yet with fine wheaten bread was the leper fed,
    And ’twas red wine he drank with his thirsty soul….
    As Sir Launfal mused with a downcast face,
    A light shone round about the place;
    The leper no longer crouched at his side,
    But stood before him glorified….
    And the voice that was calmer than silence said,
    “Lo, it is I, be not afraid!
    In many climes, without avail,
    Thou had spent thy life for the Holy Grail;
    Behold, it is here,–this cup which thou
    Didst fill at the streamlet for me but now;
    This crust is my body broken for thee,
    This water His blood that died on the tree;
    The Holy Supper is kept, indeed,
    In whatso we share with another’s need,–
    Not that which we give, but what we share,–
    For the gift without the giver is bare
    ;
    Who bestows himself with his alms feeds three,–
    Himself, his hungering neighbor, and me.”

    http://www.lib.rochester.edu/camelot/launfal.htm
    (The entire poem is about 17 pages long!)

    (Please forgive me posting this here; I’m banned on the other site.)



If you like Good Letters, you’ll love ImageUpdate.

Subscribe to our free newsletter here:


Welcome to Image. 

We curate content just for you. Subscribe to our weekly newsletter ImageUpdate for free.


Pin It on Pinterest